Economic Development Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elisinger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 2, 146-158 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/089124249500900204

State Economic Development in the 1990s: Politics and Policy Learning

Peter Elisinger

University of Wisconsin

State economic development is in a state of ferment at mid-decade, but analysts are not certain about the direction of changes going on. This article uses a national survey of state development agencies to explore three possible scenarios: that states are losing interest in economic development, that they are regressing from the entrepreneurial strategies of the 1980s to their old industrial recruitment habits, and that they are embracing "Third Wave" principles. Evidence indicates that all three of these shifts are occurring simultaneously, although not with equal force. Although one argument is that these changes are the product of a policy-learning process informed by implementation and evaluation experiences, a stronger case can be made that the states are focusing and winnowing their programs in response to political cues in the environment. Program survival rather than effectiveness appears to be an overriding goal.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
R. Shaffer, S. Deller, and D. Marcouiller
Rethinking Community Economic Development
Economic Development Quarterly, February 1, 2006; 20(1): 59 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
D. Hegde
Public and Private Universities: Unequal Sources of Regional Innovation?
Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 2005; 19(4): 373 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
W. H. Plosila
State Science- and Technology-Based Economic Development Policy: History, Trends and Developments, and Future Directions
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2004; 18(2): 113 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
E. J. Malecki
Hard and Soft Networks for Urban Competitiveness
Urban Stud, May 1, 2002; 39(5-6): 929 - 945.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
M. G. Boarnet
Enterprise Zones and Job Creation: Linking Evaluation and Practice
Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 2001; 15(3): 242 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
L. LANGER
The Consequences of State Economic Development Strategies on Income Distribution in the American States, 1976 to 1994
American Politics Research, July 1, 2001; 29(4): 392 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
P. Parker
Local-Global Partnerships for High-Tech Development: Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2001; 15(2): 149 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
M. McGuire
Collaborative Policy Making and Administration: The Operational Demands of Local Economic Development
Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 2000; 14(3): 278 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
R. Gittell, A. Kaufman, M. Karson, and R. McChesney
The New Economic Geography of the States
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2000; 14(2): 182 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
T. K. Bradshaw and E. J. Blakely
What are "Third-Wave" State Economic Development Efforts? From Incentives to Industrial Policy
Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 1999; 13(3): 229 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
M. Dinc and K. E. Haynes
Regional Efficiency in the Manufacturing Sector: Integrated Shift-Share and Data Envelopment Analysis
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 1999; 13(2): 183 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
D. Wohlgemuth and M. Kilkenny
Firm Relocation Threats and Copy Cat Costs
International Regional Science Review, August 1, 1998; 21(2): 139 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
I. Feller
Federal and State Government Roles in Science and Technology
Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 1997; 11(4): 283 - 295.
[Abstract]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
C. M. Coburn and D. M. Brown
Response: A State-Federal Partnership in Support of Science and Technology
Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 1997; 11(4): 296 - 309.
[Abstract]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
I. Feller
Rejoinder: Response to Coburn and Brown
Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 1997; 11(4): 310 - 312.