This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Spelman, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Growth, Stability, and the Urban Portfolio

University of Texas at Austin

Local governments provide infrastructure improvements, guarantee loans, and offer tax incentives to lure new businesses and keep old ones. This is usually done with one objective in mind—maximizing economic growth. Application of investment portfolio theory to historic data on metropolitan growth rates suggests that there are clear costs to this strategy in the form of increased volatility in growth rates. In addition, most cities are economically inefficient in the sense that the volatility in growth rates is greater than it would be if their economies were better diversified. The extent of this inefficiency, referred to here as avoidable risk, is an effective performance measure for local economic development activities. Local officials should consider this measure and the objective of diversification when making economic development decisions.

Key Words: portfolio theory • incentives • risk • performance measures

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Schwartz, J. Pelzman, and M. Keren The Ineffectiveness of Location Incentive Programs: Evidence From Puerto Rico and Israel Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 22(2): 167 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]