This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lowe, N. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Job Creation and the Knowledge Economy: Lessons From North Carolina's Life Science Manufacturing Initiative

University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Knowledge-intensive industries are expected to provide long-term economic prosperity for their host regions. The question persists whether these industries can also generate quality, stable jobs for a wide range of workers in these regions, particularly those with limited academic training. This article examines North Carolina's effort to respond to this challenge by integrating workforce and economic development functions in an effort to anchor life science manufacturing establishments in the state. By coordinating training, recruitment, and research activities, state agencies are influencing the location and employment strategies of life sciences firms in ways that are helping to foster a more socially inclusive transition to the knowledge economy.

Key Words: workforce development • life sciences • workforce intermediaries • North Carolina

References

• Bardhan, A., & Kroll, C. (2003). The new wave of outsourcing. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics.
• Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Benner, C. (2002). Work in the new economy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Benner, C. (2003). Labour flexibility and regional development: The role of labour market intermediaries. Regional Studies, 37(6/7), 621-633.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Bernhardt, A., Dresser, L., & Rogers, J. (2001). Taking the high road in Milwaukee. The Wisconsin Regional Training Partnership. WorkingUSA, 5(3), 109-130.[CrossRef]
• Chapple, K., & Zook, M. (2002). Why some IT jobs stay: The rise of job training in information technology. Journal of Urban Technology, 9(1), 57-83.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Conway, M., & Loker, S. (1999). The Garment Industry Development Corporation: A case study of a sectoral employment development approach. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
• Cooke, P. (2004). Regional knowledge capabilities, embeddedness of firms and industry organization: Bioscience megacentres and economic geography. European Planning Studies, 12(5), 625-641.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Cortright, J., & Mayer, H. (2002). Signs of life: The growth of biotechnology centers in the U.S. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
• DeVol, R., Wong, P., Bedroussian, A., Wallace, L., Ki, J., Murphy, D., et al. (2004). Biopharmaceutical industry contributions to state and U.S. economies. Los Angeles: Milken Institute.
• Dossani, R., & Kenney, M. (2007). Moving services offshore: A case study of a U.S. high-technology firm. Report prepared for the European Union—U.S. Department of Labor Offshoring of Services in ICT and Related Services seminar, Washington, DC.
• Feldman, M. (2003). The locational dynamics of the U.S. biotech industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Industry and Innovation, 10(3), 311-328.[CrossRef]
• Fitzgerald, J. (2006). Moving up in the new economy: Career ladders for U.S. workers. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
• Fitzgerald, J., & Green Leigh, N. (2002). Economic revitalization: Cases and strategies for city and suburb. London: Sage.
• Fligstein, N., & Shin, T. (2004). The shareholder value society: A review of the changes in working conditions and inequality in the United States, 1976 to 2000. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 401-432). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Fung, A., & Zdrazil, S. (2004). Ecologies of workforce development in Milwaukee. In R. Giloth (Ed.), Workforce development politics: Civic capacity and performance (pp. 75-101). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Giloth, R. (1998). Introduction: A case for workforce intermediaries. In R. Giloth (Ed.), Jobs and economic development (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Harrison, B., & Weiss, M. (1998). Workforce development networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Howell, D. (1994, Summer). The skills myth. American Prospect, 5, 81-90.
• Hum, T. ( 2003). Mapping global production in New York City's garment industry: The role of Sunset Park, Brooklyn's immigrant economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 17, 294-309.[Abstract]
• Kamarck, M. (2006). Building biomanufacturing capacity: The chapter and verse. Nature Biotechnology, 24(5), 503-505.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Kennedy, K. (2003). Window on the workplace 2003: A training needs assessment for the biomanufacturing workforce. Durham: North Carolina Biotechnology Center.
• Lancaster, H.M. (2001). North Carolina Community College System: Economic and workforce development (Annual report). Raleigh: North Carolina Community College System.
• Lautsch, B., & Osterman, P. (1998). Changing the constraints: A successful employment and training strategy. In R. Giloth (Ed.), Jobs and economic development (pp. 214-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Lowe, N., & Gertler, M. (2005). Diversity and the evolution of a life science innovation system: The Toronto region in comparative perspective. In D. Wolfe & M. Lucas (Eds.), Global networks and local linkages: The paradox of clusters in an open economy (pp. 25-55). Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
• Melendez, E., & Harrison, B. (1998). Working on jobs: The Center for Employment Training. Economic Development Quarterly, 12, 12-29.[Abstract]
• Niosi, J., & Bas, T. (2003). Biotechnology megacentres: Montreal and Toronto regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 11(7), 789-804.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• North Carolina Biotechnology Center. (1999 ). A progress report 1984-1999: Celebrating fifteen years of growth. Research Triangle Park: Author.
• North Carolina Biotechnology Center. (2004 a). BioManufacturing: A high growth industry for North Carolina's 21st century economy. Research Triangle Park: Author.
• North Carolina Biotechnology Center. (2004 b). New jobs across North Carolina: A strategic plan for growing the economy statewide through biotechnology. Research Triangle Park: Author.
• North Carolina Biotechnology Center. (2005 ). Company directory. Retrieved September 2005 from http://www.ncbiotech.org/ncbio/ncindustry/directories/companies/codir.cfm
• Osterman, P. (1999). Security prosperity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Osterman, P., & Batt, R. (1993). Employer centered training for international competitiveness: Lessons from state programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(3), 456-477.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2007). Flexible recession: The temporary staffing industry and mediated work in the United States. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, 171-192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Schweke, B. (1999). Linking incentives and employment programs. Accountability: The Newsletter of the Business Incentives Clearinghouse, 1(3), 1-8.
• Schweke, B. (2004). Promising practices to assist dislocated workers (Working paper). Raleigh: North Carolina Rural Economic Development Center.
• Schwind, D. (2005, June 13). Center to bring classes, growth. News and Observer, p. B1.
• Thiel, K. (2004). Biomanufacturing, from bust to boom... to bubble? Nature Biotechnology, 22(11), 1365-1372.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). The U.S. economic census. Retrieved September 2005 from http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/
• Vollmer, S. (2004, November 2). Asia pushing N.C. for biotech: State focusing on pharmaceutical industry after textile losses, but low costs overseas hurt. News and Observer, p. D1.
• Wyeth opens new lab: Drug company will research, develop vaccines at the Technology Park. (2004, February 25). Durham Herald-Sun, p. B1.

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, 339-353 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242407306359


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mintrom Competitive Federalism and the Governance of Controversial Science Publius, September 1, 2009; 39(4): 606 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lowe, N. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?