Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic Development Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0891242409340899v1
23/4/306    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besser, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of New Employers From the Outside, the Growth of Local Capitalism, and New Amenities on the Social and Economic Welfare of Small Towns

Terry L. Besser

Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, tbesser{at}iastate.edu

Nicholas Recker

Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

Matthew Parker

Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

The purpose of this study was to determine if the outcomes of economic development result in the anticipated economic and social benefits.The authors differentiated between the proximal outcomes of development (e.g., attracting a new employer) and their distal outcomes (e.g., increased employment and income). Indicators of economic change from secondary sources were merged with primary data from resident surveys and key informants’ interviews for 99 small Iowa towns for the analyses. Findings show that the opening of absentee-owned employers had positive economic benefits compared to the situation in other similar towns. However, it was not accompanied by gains in quality of life. The growth of local capitalism was associated with more positive quality of life outcomes. New amenities were not associated with economic or quality of life changes.

Key Words: economic development policy • rural development • industrial policy • industrial location • community development

This version was published on November 1, 2009

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 4, 306-316 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242409340899
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?