Economic Development Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erickcek, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by McKinney, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 3, 232-258 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242406290377
© 2006 SAGE Publications

"Small Cities Blues:" Looking for Growth Factors in Small and Medium-Sized Cities

George A. Erickcek

W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Hannah McKinney

Kalamazoo College

The purpose of this exploratory study is an attempt to identify public policies that have the potential to increase the economic viability of smaller metropolitan areas and cities. The authors identify characteristics associated with smaller metro areas that performed better than expected (winners) and worse than expected (losers) during the 1990s. The authors then look for evidence that public policy choices may have enhanced a metro area' ability to succeed by examining whether winners and losers are qualitatively different in ways that may indicate consequences of policy choices. A cluster analysis is completed to group the metro areas based on changes in social, economic, and demographic variables during the 1990s. The authors then use contingency table analysis and ANOVA to see if winners and losers are related to the grouping of metro areas in a way that may indicate the presence of government policy.

Key Words: growth policy • small metro areas • economic development growth policy • ranking of small metro areas


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?