Economic Development Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klier, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, 117-128 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242405286158

Where the Headquarters Are: Location Patterns of Large Public Companies, 1990-2000

Thomas H. Klier

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

This article examines the location of headquarters growth of large public companies during the 1990s. Headquarters continue to be attracted by large metropolitan areas. Yet among that group, they continue to disperse into medium-sized centers. This article identifies six different categories of gross flows underlying the net change of headquarters observed during the 1990s. There is strong variation among the 50 largest metropolitan areas in terms of the composition of these gross flows. On average, entry and exit represent more than two thirds of all gross flow activity. Pure relocation of headquarters is found to lead to urbanization. Mergers tend to have no impact on the distribution of headquarters across Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). A binomial probability model of the decision to move uses company-level and MSA-level data and finds that MSA-level amenities affect a company’s choice about where to locate its headquarters.

Key Words: headquarters location • MSA amenities • gross flows


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?