Economic Development Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toikka, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Neveu, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 1, 62-79 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242404268707

The "Poverty Trap" and Living Wage Laws

Richard S. Toikka

Metropolitan Legal Services, LLC

Aaron Yelowitz

University of Kentucky

Andre Neveu

Employment Policies Institute, City University of New York

Advocates of living wage laws claim wage mandates will help families escape poverty by increasing family earnings beyond the poverty line. This article examines such programs and the effect a change in pay would have on taxes and benefits for low-income families in cities where living wage laws have been enacted or considered. Many families living with earnings below the poverty line take advantage of programs specifically designed to help them out of poverty. Phase-out rates of benefit programs are structured so that additional earnings from living wages largely disappear through benefit reduction and increased taxation. The living wage appears to be badly targeted and ineffective at raising comprehensive disposable income. Such vanishing benefits reduce the ability of living wage laws to reduce poverty. Nearly 75% of those affected by the living wage were not initially in poverty, and more than 40% had initial incomes at least twice the poverty line.

Key Words: poverty • living wage • employment • marginal tax rates • low income • transfer programs • welfare


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?