Economic Development Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ong, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4, 368-383 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242404268967
© 2004 SAGE Publications

An Analysis of the Los Angeles Revitalization Zone: Are Place-Based Investment Strategies Effective Under Moderate Economic Conditions?

James H. Spencer

University of Hawai’i at Manoa

Paul Ong

University of California, Los Angeles

This article examines the economic effect of the Los Angeles Revitalization Zone (LARZ) on private sector investments. The LARZ program was established after the 1992 Los Angeles riots and designed to rebuild the neighborhoods most affected by them. Unlike most place-based programs, the LARZ included significant clusters of business activity and was not made up of the poorest of the poor in Los Angeles. Like other place-based development efforts, the LARZ did not seem to generate significant benefits for the targeted neighborhoods. Using an ordinary least squared (OLS) model that controls for socioeconomic, economic, agglomeration, and riot intensity factors, we found that the LARZ program had a negative effect on all but the very lowest value building permits. The study suggests that place-based infrastructure and development programs may not be effective at stimulating investment, even where economic and socioeconomic barriers are not severe. Moreover, it points to a research gap in nonmarket factors that might help explain construction investment.

Key Words: Los Angeles riots • place-based policy • neighborhood tax credits • Revitalization Zone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. H. Spencer
Neighborhood Economic Development Effects of the Earned Income Tax Credit in Los Angeles: Poor Places and Policies for the Working Poor
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2007; 42(6): 851 - 873.
[Abstract] [PDF]