Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic Development Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephan, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Doctoral Education and Economic Development: The Flow of New Ph.D.s to Industry

Paula E. Stephan

Albert J. Sumell

Grant C. Black

Georgia State University

James D. Adams

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Doctoral education in science and engineering is critical to the university’s role in fostering economic development. One aspect of this is the placement of recent graduates with firms. Despite the role Ph.D.s play in this process, little work has documented and analyzed these firm placements. This article takes a first step at rectifying this deficiency, using data from the 1997-1999 Survey of Earned Doctorates administered by the National Science Foundation to all doctoral recipients in the United States. The authors show that knowledge sources, as measured by the training location of new Ph.D.s going to industry, are concentrated in different geographic centers from those that university R&Dexpenditure data would suggest. The authors also find significant outflows from the Midwest of Ph.D.s and significant inflows to the Pacific and northeast regions of the country. The authors’work suggests that many states fail to capture the economic development advantages that come from training a skilled work force.

Key Words: economic development • innovation • firm R&D • Ph.D. employment • Ph.D. mobility • knowledge transfer

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, 151-167 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242403262019


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
M. Nagle
Canonical Analysis of University Presence and Industrial Comparative Advantage
Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 2007; 21(4): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
J. L. Hall
Developing Historical 50-State Indices of Innovation Capacity and Commercialization Capacity
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2007; 21(2): 107 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]