Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic Development Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howland, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Private Initiative and Public Responsibility for the Redevelopment of Industrial Brownfields: Three Baltimore Case Studies

Marie Howland

University of Maryland

This article examines three case studies of brownfield redevelopment in Baltimore, Maryland, to refine understanding of the boundary between privately and publicly initiated brownfield redevelopments. The cases range from Camden Crossing, a city- initiated project that promised to turn an abandoned and contaminated site into middle-income housing, to Crown Cork and Seal, a privately funded site reclaimed for industrial use. The cases suggest trade-offs between the following three conditions: (a) the strength of local market demand, (b) the level of contamination, and (c) new use. When market conditions are strong, contamination relatively minor, and land use is remaining industrial, the private sector is more likely to be the sole initiator and implementer of redevelopment. When a project calls for a transfer from contaminated industrial to residential use, faces weak market demand for the final project, and con- tends with a complicated cleanup, the greater is the required public subsidy.

Key Words: brownfields • contamination • industrial redevelopment • inner-city redevelopment • Baltimore

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, 367-381 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242403257437


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
C. A. De Sousa, C. Wu, and L. M. Westphal
Assessing the Effect of Publicly Assisted Brownfield Redevelopment on Surrounding Property Values
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2009; 23(2): 95 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
M. Howland
Employment Effects of Brownfield Redevelopment: What Do We Know from the Literature?
Journal of Planning Literature, November 1, 2007; 22(2): 91 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
M. Howland
The Role of Contamination in Central City Industrial Decline
Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 2004; 18(3): 207 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]