This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sanders, H. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Convention Myths and Markets: A Critical Review of Convention Center Feasibility Studies

University of Texas at San Antonio

American cities are seeing a boom in the development of convention centers. In city after city, massive public investment in convention facilities has been justified by feasibility and market studies that consistently portray a booming national demand for exhibition space. These studies also suggest that the demand for convention center space has and will outrun increases in the supply of space. This article reviews studies for more than 30 cities and demonstrates that they have been consistently flawed and misleading. Some analyses argue that successful convention centers need to expand to remain competitive. Others conclude that failing centers need to add space to succeed. Studies repeat the same positive findings verbatim from one city to another and fail to account for contradictory data. These market and feasibility studies thus offer no real basis for public investment and serve to bias public decision making and choice.

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 3, 195-210 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/08942402016003001


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. V. Hall "We'd Have to Sink the Ships": Impact Studies and the 2002 West Coast Port Lockout Economic Development Quarterly, November 1, 2004; 18(4): 354 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]