Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic Development Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tansey, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Response to August 2000 Forum Article by Timothy Bates on Financing for the Development of Urban Minority Communities

Charles D. Tansey

JP Morgan Chase, the Bank of New York, Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corporation, Commonwealth Capital Partners, and the Minority Investment Development Corporation

Tim Bates focuses on the poor performance of Minority Enterprise Small Business Investment Companies (MESBICS) in the 1987-to-1994 period as a basis for criticizing the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, New Market Venture Capital, and other federal efforts at promoting capital formation in the inner city. MESBICS did indeed fail during that period, but so did a number of conventional Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs)—and mostly for the same reasons. The SBA made sweeping program changes in 1994 and 1995 that significantly improved the SBIC industry performance and dramatically increased participation of inner-city entrepreneurs. The SBA’s job is not to mitigate risk by avoiding financing gaps, but to take the risk that the private sector cannot or will not take—and develop effective ways to manage it. The process is necessarily iterative, and the key questions are as follows: What are the impediments we face now, and how do we overcome them?

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, 180-184 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242402016002008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
T. Bates
Rejoinder to Charles D. Tansey: Moving Toward a More Effective Small Business Administration
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 2002; 16(2): 185 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]