This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sullivan, D. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Local Governments as Risk Takers and Risk Reducers: An Examination of Business Subsidies and Subsidy Controls

Portland State University

Many U.S. local governments that promote economic development give business subsidies, creating high levels of risk and uncertainty. Their main concern is that firms receiving subsidies may not benefit the city as much as the cost of the subsidies. To overcome this risk and uncertainty, many local governments now use subsidy controls, such as performance agreements, clawback clauses, and evaluation policies. Using survey data from more than 1,600 local governments, the author found that the majority use both business subsidies and subsidy controls. A positive association exists between these two activities: Local governments that give more in subsidies tend to employ more subsidy controls. This suggests that there is not a trade-off but rather a complementary relationship between promoting development aggressively by giving subsidies and regulating businesses to ensure that city residents benefit from subsidies.

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, 115-126 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0891242402016002002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Lobao and D. S. Kraybill The Emerging Roles of County Governments in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Areas: Findings From a National Survey Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 2005; 19(3): 245 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF]