Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic Development Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Innes, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Booher, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Metropolitan Development as a Complex System: A New Approach to Sustainability

Judith E. Innes

Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley

David E. Booher

Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley

A major national debate is under way about the effects of the regulation of development and land use patterns on metropolitan economies. Because this is often framed around whether sprawling development patterns are harmful or beneficial to the economy and environment, we are seemingly presented with an either/or choice. This article asserts that the debate misses the reality that metropolitan development occurs as part of a complex system. If we view metropolitan development as a complex system, there is no fundamental conflict between environmental goals and economic development. Examining the case of California, the authors demonstrate how the relationship between these is part of a larger system involving fiscal policy, governance structure, infrastructure policy, and other factors. The authors propose three strategies for improving metropolitan system performance to ensure sustainable metropolitan economies and environments: developing and using indicators for self-organizing urban systems, collaboration and consensus building among metropolitan stakeholders, and metropolitan leadership.

Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 2, 141-156 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/089124249901300204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
E. S. Zeemering
What Does Sustainability Mean to City Officials?
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2009; 45(2): 247 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. Abbott
Planning for Complex Metropolitan Regions: A Better Future or a More Certain One?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2009; 28(4): 503 - 517.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
C. Greed
Overcoming the Factors Inhibiting the Mainstreaming of Gender into Spatial Planning Policy in the United Kingdom
Urban Stud, April 1, 2005; 42(4): 719 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. W. Wassmer
Fiscalisation of Land Use, Urban Growth Boundaries and Non-central Retail Sprawl in the Western United States
Urban Stud, July 1, 2002; 39(8): 1307 - 1327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
D. E. Booher and J. E. Innes
Network Power in Collaborative Planning
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2002; 21(3): 221 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]