Economic Development Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buss, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yancer, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Economic Development Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 1, 29-37 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/089124249901300105

Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Normative Perspective

Terry F. Buss

Suffolk University

Laura C. Yancer

The Ohio State University

Policy makers rely on cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to help them select the best policies and projects to alleviate poverty. But CBA, as practiced in the United States, not only fails to inform policy makers about the best use of scarce resources but helps make poverty worse for many people. International donor organizations—the United Nations, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and World Bank—have sophisticated CBA methods that could better serve policy makers in deciding how to help poor people. The authors look at the results of CBA in four economic development venues—enterprise zones, military base redevelopment, sports stadiums, and business incentives—for developing a critique of cost-benefit practices. A brief program is offered to correct cost-benefit practice, but it is concluded that reform must come not from policy makers and policy analysts who now use CBA but from outsiders who want to influence political systems on behalf of poor people.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
T. F. Buss
The Effect of State Tax Incentives on Economic Growth and Firm Location Decisions: An Overview of the Literature
Economic Development Quarterly, February 1, 2001; 15(1): 90 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
L. A. Reese and D. Fasenfest
Critical Perspectives on Local Development Policy Evaluation
Economic Development Quarterly, February 1, 1999; 13(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract] [PDF]