| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/089124249901300105 Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Normative PerspectiveSuffolk University
The Ohio State University Policy makers rely on cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to help them select the best policies and projects to alleviate poverty. But CBA, as practiced in the United States, not only fails to inform policy makers about the best use of scarce resources but helps make poverty worse for many people. International donor organizationsthe United Nations, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and World Bankhave sophisticated CBA methods that could better serve policy makers in deciding how to help poor people. The authors look at the results of CBA in four economic development venuesenterprise zones, military base redevelopment, sports stadiums, and business incentivesfor developing a critique of cost-benefit practices. A brief program is offered to correct cost-benefit practice, but it is concluded that reform must come not from policy makers and policy analysts who now use CBA but from outsiders who want to influence political systems on behalf of poor people.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
